Grammarly, Really?

I was watching a YouTube video on cameras, and an advertisement for Grammarly came up. I didn’t manage to catch the text but I googled, and this is a typical Grammarly advertisement.

It features a ‘student’ and a voiceover from Grammarly, and starts with the student speaking aloud to himself:

Student: “Once everything’s perfectly organized, I’ll start working on my thesis.”

Grammarly: “Grammarly will ensure you feel confident nailing your final thesis by supporting your writing journey from start to finish. Welcome to Ideation Station.”

Student: “How do I write the perfect intro paragraph?”

Grammarly: “You start with understanding what makes a perfect intro. Grammarly can highlight precise tips for an introductory paragraph based on the research you’ve done so far.”

Student, in amazement: “An informative and inspiring intro. This is exactly what my thesis needed. Now that I’ve got a strong intro, I need to take a pass at perfecting some of the remaining paragraphs. Revision time?”

Grammarly: “Revision time. Here at Revision Division, we ensure your writing is the highest quality it can be. This paragraph can be simplified. Grammarly can paraphrase this by using the “improve it” prompt, all while maintaining your voice and keeping your work sounding professional.

I highlighted ‘your’ because plainly it is not ‘your’. It is not the student’s work.

Or this one:

As students, we’re constantly evaluated on the quality of our writing, on essays, homework, internship applications.

What I love about Grammarly is that it helps me save my time and my brain power for figuring out what I want to say. I can focus on getting my ideas onto the page and then Grammarly comes in to make sure that those ideas are communicated in a clear and compelling way.

What does that mean that “we’re constantly evaluated on the quality of our writing” – who is the ‘our’ after Grammarly has worked its magic?

Grammarly versus ChatGPT

I wonder whether Grammarly does a better job than just asking ChatGPT to reword a piece of text?

I know – let’s ask ChatGPT to rewrite the previous Grammarly advertisement text in the tone of a game show host making fun of the proceedings?

🎤 “Ladies and gentlemen, let’s give a big round of applause for Grammarly! That’s right, folks, the magical, brain-saving sidekick you never knew you needed! It swoops in like a superhero, saving you from the soul-crushing burden of… thinking too hard! 🦸‍♂️📝

Why wrestle with grammar or wrestle with your own ideas when Grammarly is here to sprinkle its fairy dust of clarity and make you look like a literary genius? You just throw your half-baked thoughts on the page, and BAM! Grammarly polishes them up like a five-star chef plating a fancy meal. Who knew making sense could be so easy?! Thank you, Grammarly, for doing the heavy lifting while we sit back and pretend we’ve got it all together!” 🎉

I don’t know what Grammarly’s business model is but I imagine that it needs to work really hard to distinguish its product from the AI Large Language Models that can do projects wholesale just from prompts.

If I look deeper into this – what is Grammarly going to produce in the end? If students manage to get through and are let loose in the world – who and what has actually graduated?

It’s scary stuff because there is a disconnect between the unadorned person and the person with the tools they try to sneak past the examiners. And it is definitely ‘sneak past’ because they would not write at the end of their texts ‘Improved by Grammarly’.

What is the next step to stop this – to have students write essays in a public room with invigilators?


Discover more from Photograph Works

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

8 responses to “Grammarly, Really?”

  1. Well-written article. Mind-boggling writing from Grammarly. And lord, what a hornet’s nest for teachers!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I laughed out loud at ChatGPT’s rewrite. 😄

    Yes, AI is a challenge and I believe I read there are a couple of methods in the works to discover if the writing was created by AI. That was a few iterations ago and I honestly do not know what, if anything, has happened since then because I haven’t followed it.

    My solution to the educational aspect? Make ’em write longhand or use a typewriter. 😎

    Like

    1. I heard about the AI detector, too. Maybe students in the future will have to be marked for their skill in outwitting the AI detector….

      Liked by 1 person

    2. Oh yes, a friend of Tamara’s who teaches in the school system in the States says they no longer teach cursive handwriting in their school. And an article in the Guardian a couple of days ago says “The Common Core State Standards for education in the US, which outline the skills students are expected to achieve at each grade level, no longer require students to learn cursive writing. Finland removed cursive writing from its schools in 2016, and Switzerland, among other countries, has also reduced instruction in cursive handwriting” and it goes on to comment that if you can’t write it, you probably can’t read it. Speaking personally, I bought a fountain pen about five years ago precisely because my handwriting was falling apart using gel pens and similar. Here’s the Guardian article.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Thanks, I’ll have a read. Education worldwide in general is taking a beating and the effects are evident. 😦

        Like

      2. The link to the Guardian article isn’t opening.

        Like

        1. Could you try again?

          Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Photograph Works

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading