Nikon D40x Review: Affordable 10MP CCD Camera in 2024

Nikon introduced the D40x in 2007 as pretty much a base model in their lineup. It had a 10MP CCD sensor and it could shoot at three frames per second in continuous shooting.

Some people prefer cameras that have CCD sensors compared to cameras that have CMOS sensors.

No camera manufacturer makes cameras with CCD sensors today. That’s because the camera reads the signal from the sensor line by line. That doesn’t mean CCD sensors are inevitably slow, but they are inherently at a disadvantage.

CMOS cameras record all the micro-lenses on the sensor simultaneously, so that’s what camera manufacturers use today.

Let me put the speed of the Nikon D40x in context. Three frames per second is about as fast as a person blinks. If a person tried to blink fast continuously they would soon slow down. They would slow down because of lack of oxygen to the eye muscles.

But let’s say that a person can blink about three times in a second. I just tried it using the stopwatch on my phone and I can blink that fast.

My Canon R6 with its CMOS sensor. can shoot continuously at 12 frames per second with a mechanical shutter. And it can shoot at 20 frames per second silently with the electronic shutter. It can keep on going as well. It can shoot bursts of up to 240 RAW files (or over 1,000 JPEGs) before it slows down. It slows down while it clears the buffer. Then in a moment, it can start again.

And it can do all that while tracking a moving subject and adjusting focus and exposure.

If you think that’s fast, here are two really fast cameras. The Sony A9 II can shoot at 120 frames per second. The Canon R3 can shoot at 195 frames per second.

So the D40x is not a speed demon. So what has it got going for it in 2024? Well, it is cheap. You can pick up a body for £60 or thereabouts. And the cheap little Nikon AF-S 35mm f1.8 G is a sharp lens.

But the camera is only 10 megapixels. And it is an old sensor. It is old even if it is a CCD sensor that they say delivers a cleaner signal to the processor.

Judge for yourself with this photo of a woman that I saw today while walking around the city. The second photo is a crop of the first.

And yes, it is not as sharp and clear as I can shoot with my Canon .But it’s not bad, is it?


Discover more from Photograph Works

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

8 responses to “Nikon D40x Review: Affordable 10MP CCD Camera in 2024”

  1. Amazing stats about how many frames per second some shutters can do, thanks for explaining as you have.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Sport, bird, and animal photographers have access to incredible equipment nowadays.

      Liked by 3 people

  2. I blogged about megapixels recently in this context. 6 megapixels of low noose, well exposed, sharp image, can print well at 8×10. And even well enough at larger sizes. Those massive megapixel sensors can definitely be punishing and sometimes it’s useful to go low on the mp count 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’ve been reading reviews along the same lines about about high MP cameras like the Sony A7CR, the Fuji X-T5, and the Fuji X100VA. The reviewers seem to be basically saying that there’s just no increase in image quality because most lenses can’t keep up.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. More megapixels does capture more fine detail, but that’s limited by the lens and also by the printer. The printer needs to be able to actually print that detail. At smaller print sizes, that detail isn’t apparent. It’s much larger sizes where it makes a difference. Question is, how big do you want to print? If web sharing and the occasional small print is what you do, 45 megapixels really don’t matter.

        Like

        1. Yes, for sure. One thing that stops me using my phone for everything is that nagging feeling of ‘but what if I want to print bigger?’ I wonder when they will come out with phones with 200mm-equivalent focal lengths?

          Liked by 1 person

          1. I feel the same way actually. As much as I enjoyed my old Lumia 1020, it just didn’t compare to a good camera. 50 mp on a tiny sensor just isn’t the same.

            Like

  3. I just purchased the D40 for fun 🙂

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Photograph Works

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading